In the paired comparison method, how is the performance evaluated?

In the paired comparison method, how is the performance evaluated?

• A. Against a standard
• B. By ranking individuals
• C. By comparing each employee to every other employee
• D. Through narrative descriptions

Answer: (C)

The paired comparison method evaluates performance by comparing each employee to every other employee in the group. This technique involves assessing the performance of employees in pairs, where one employee is compared directly to another to determine who exhibits better performance. As a result, each employee's performance is judged in relation to that of their peers, leading to a ranking based solely on these direct comparisons. Using this method provides a clear framework to identify relative performance levels among a group, minimizing subjectivity that can come from self-assessments or single-standard evaluations. By having employees assessed against each other rather than against a set standard or criteria, the results can yield a more nuanced understanding of individual performance, allowing organizations to recognize high achievers and address any performance issues effectively. This approach also helps in making promotions, bonuses, or development decisions based on a clearer picture of how individuals stand in comparison to their coworkers.

The paired comparison method evaluates performance by comparing each employee to every other employee in the group. This technique involves assessing the performance of employees in pairs, where one employee is compared directly to another to determine who exhibits better performance. As a result, each employee's performance is judged in relation to that of their peers, leading to a ranking based solely on these direct comparisons.

Using this method provides a clear framework to identify relative performance levels among a group, minimizing subjectivity that can come from self-assessments or single-standard evaluations. By having employees assessed against each other rather than against a set standard or criteria, the results can yield a more nuanced understanding of individual performance, allowing organizations to recognize high achievers and address any performance issues effectively. This approach also helps in making promotions, bonuses, or development decisions based on a clearer picture of how individuals stand in comparison to their coworkers.